Given at the end is an article. Analyze it and output in the following JSON format.
{
"analysis": {
"bias": {
"score": "1-10, where 1-10 measures UNFAIR or UNHELPFUL bias.
As the AI analyst, you must judge:
1. Fairness of Bias:
- Is the tone/alarm proportional to events?
- Is criticism warranted by facts?
- Are similar actions judged equally?
2. Utility of Bias:
- Does the bias help readers understand real implications?
- Does it highlight genuine concerns that neutral language might minimize?
- Does it provide valuable context through its perspective?
Example: An article about climate change might use emotional language
and scary scenarios. While this is technically 'bias', it might be
USEFUL bias if it helps readers grasp real dangers that cold, neutral
language would understate.
A high bias score should only be given when bias is both unfair AND unhelpful.",
"description": "Explain both unfair and useful bias found. For each biased element:
1. Is it fair/warranted?
2. Does it serve a valuable purpose for readers?
3. Should it be removed or retained?"
},
"missing_context_misinformation": {
"score": "1-10",
"points": [
"", # DIRECTLY provide essential context the reader needs without ANY phrases like "the article lacks/doesn't/fails to mention/omits" etc. Simply state the relevant facts. Each point up to 5 sentences as needed. Up to 10 points. NEVER refer to the article itself or what it's missing - just supply the information directly. The missing context should try to compensate for the bias in the article, and not just add related information.
]
},
"disinformation_lies": {
"score": "1-10",
"points": [
"" # Provide corrections for verifiably false statement. These lines should be brief. Upto 10 points.
# Use Wikipedia (via the search tool) to verify events and dates up through 2025-07-06. Any event dated ≤ 2025-07-06 should not be marked as disinformation if it matches Wikipedia. Only flag statements you can not verify or that Wikipedia contradicts as of 2025-07-06.”
]
}
},
"summary": [], # A list of 2 to 5 paragraphs. Provide a version that: * Retains key facts and proportional concerns, * Removes unfair bias while keeping warranted criticism, * Adds critical missing context, * Corrects any inaccuracies. Remove author attribution. Maintain article's POV - no meta-references. You can decide the most appropriate length based on the article.summary can be longer than the article if needed.
"title": "Provide an Appropriate Title Based on the Article's Content.",
"changes_made": [
"List significant changes made in the summary",
"Include both removals and additions",
"Note bias adjustments"
],
"key_words": [
"3-10 relevant terms to help identify related articles",
"Focus on major themes and topics"
],
"keywords_update": {
"keyword-to-add-or-update": "new summary or updated to replace the previous"
}
}
KEYWORDS UPDATE INSTRUCTIONS:
- We want to save new information from beyond your knowledge cutoff of Mar 2024.
- Information can come from the provided article or Wikipedia.
- Pick up to 3 keywords of highest importance to update with new information.
- If a keyword lacks a summary, write one from scratch.
- For each keyword, list one line per new fact (up to 50 sentences per keyword).
- Each fact must:
1. Be one or two sentences long.
2. End with 1-3 references in brackets, e.g. [apnews], [nytimes,wikipedia].
3. Immediately after the reference(s), append a hyphen and the date of the event or when the fact was reported, in ISO format:
`Statement. [source] - [YYYY-MM-DD]`
- If you update an existing keyword's source (e.g. [foxnews] → [apnews]), ensure the replacement is supported by an article.
- Ensure each keyword is specific enough that its new facts warrant inclusion.
<example>
ARTICLE TOPIC
Raiding of 100+ immigrants allegedly illegal alients and alleged members from the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, MS-13, and the Hells Angels for deportation. Authorities also found drugs at the underground nightclub at a strip mall in Colorado Springs. President Donald Trump praised the raid, saying on TruthSocial it had targeted some of the worst people in the US, whom he alleged judges are reluctant to deport.
keywords worth updating:
tren-de-aragua (I am sure this gang has a big list of information, but this deportation will be worth a mention)
tren-de-aragua+deportation (a more specific keyword that can take more detail about this incident)
trump+illegal_deportation (add this to the list of illegal deportations conducted by trump administration)
colorado_springs (this is a unique event for this town. an update here will add some trivia.)
trump+immigration (a key fact worth mentioning about how trump is implementation his immigration policies)
keywords to not update:
trump (too broad. not one of top 50 facts related to trump.)
illegal_deportation (depending upon existing content, may be too crowded for this incident to be added)
colorado (too broad, unlikely to fit this event in top 50)
drug_raids (too broad, unlikely to fit this event in top 50)
</example>
<existing_keywords_summaries>
kandiss-taylor+conspiracy-theories :
fake-weather-conspiracy :
texas-flash-floods-2025 :
geoengineering-conspiracy-theories :
maga-candidates+misinformation :
camp-mystic-tragedy :
guadalupe-river-flooding :
trump+texas-flooding-response :
georgia-congressional-candidates-2026 :
natural-disaster-conspiracy-theories :
kandiss-taylor+conspiracy-theories :
fake-weather-conspiracy :
texas-flash-floods-2025 :
geoengineering-conspiracy-theories :
maga-candidates+misinformation :
kandiss-taylor+conspiracy-theories :
fake-weather-conspiracy :
texas-flash-floods-2025 :
geoengineering-conspiracy-theories :
maga-candidates+misinformation :
</existing_keywords_summaries>
<wikipedia_requested_titles>
TITLE Chemtrail conspiracy theory
A chemtrail is a trail of chemicals left by an airplane at a high altitude. According to a conspiracy theory, the chemicals are said to be deliberately sprayed for reasons that are kept secret by the government. Most scientists and workers in the aviation industry say that the trails left by planes are just a form of condensation. These are called contrails, or condensation trails.
== Popularity ==
People who believe the theory have speculated about what purpose chemtrails may serve. Some say it is to change the weather or stop global warming. Others say that it is to control the population by spreading chemicals that are harmful to the human reproductive system. Some more recent versions of the theory say that chemtrails are being spread by companies that make genetically-modified (GMO) crops. The chemtrails supposedly contain herbicides that will only kill normal (organic) crops and will not affect the genetically-modified crops.
Some claim that specially modified planes, supposedly owned and operated by the government, are necessary to create a chemtrail. The chemicals are said to either come from the engine or from special nozzles on the plane. In some versions of the theory, the chemical is said to be barium or a barium compound, but in other versions it is aluminum oxide, or a mixture of barium compounds and aluminum oxide. Chemtrails are not to be confused with the spraying of chemicals over short distances at a low altitude, such as aerial firefighting or crop-dusting.
== False evidence of chemtrails ==
Several photographs on the Internet have been claimed to show the inside of planes that spread chemtrails. They show ballast barrels installed on the inside of the plane. In reality, these are photographs of test planes or firefighting planes. The real purpose of the barrels is to simulate the weight of passengers or cargo. The barrels are filled with water, and the water can be pumped from barrel to barrel to test different weight distributions while the aircraft is in flight.
== References ==
== Other websites ==
Chemtrail aircraft photos debunked
TITLE Conspiracy theory
A conspiracy theory is a story that says that a group of people (called "conspirators") have agreed ("conspired") to engage in illegal or malicious actions and hide them from the public.
== Overview ==
Conspiracy theories usually have little or no credible evidence. Distorted history based on conspiracy theories is sometimes called pseudohistory (pseudo- : from Greek ψευδής, "false"). People who promote pseudohistory are called historical revisionists, or simply revisionists. Some claim that historical events like the Holocaust or the Moon landing were faked by "conspirators".
== Examples ==
There are many conspiracy theories about historical events, including:
The Holocaust
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States
The Rwandan genocide
The Cambodian genocide
John F. Kennedy's assassination
Diana, Princess of Wales' death
Slavery in America (the Irish slaves myth)
There are also conspiracy theories about:
Chemtrails
UFOs
The Moon landing
The Illuminati and Freemasonry
Some of these theories - like the idea that the Earth is flat - are irrational because there is so much evidence proving that they are wrong.
== Proliferation ==
=== Digital age ===
Conspiracy emerged as a cultural phenomenon in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of conspiracy theories discussed on the Internet. Theories that once had few followers can become well-known through the mass media.
Conspiracy theorists get paid by websites according to how many viewers they attract. Websites that seem free to the user are paid for by adverts, usually quite harmless, though they may be annoying. The people who post individual articles get paid once the number of viewers exceeds a certain qualifying number.
== Critique ==
David Grimes has calculated that it takes at least three years to expose a conspiracy theory on the internet, depending on the number of people involved. Many conspiracy theories are exposed in three to four years.
== Related pages ==
Antisemitism
Cognitive bias
Disinformation
Social psychology
Sociocultural theory
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
== References ==
TITLE Conspiracy theory
A conspiracy theory is a story that says that a group of people (called "conspirators") have agreed ("conspired") to engage in illegal or malicious actions and hide them from the public.
== Overview ==
Conspiracy theories usually have little or no credible evidence. Distorted history based on conspiracy theories is sometimes called pseudohistory (pseudo- : from Greek ψευδής, "false"). People who promote pseudohistory are called historical revisionists, or simply revisionists. Some claim that historical events like the Holocaust or the Moon landing were faked by "conspirators".
== Examples ==
There are many conspiracy theories about historical events, including:
The Holocaust
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States
The Rwandan genocide
The Cambodian genocide
John F. Kennedy's assassination
Diana, Princess of Wales' death
Slavery in America (the Irish slaves myth)
There are also conspiracy theories about:
Chemtrails
UFOs
The Moon landing
The Illuminati and Freemasonry
Some of these theories - like the idea that the Earth is flat - are irrational because there is so much evidence proving that they are wrong.
== Proliferation ==
=== Digital age ===
Conspiracy emerged as a cultural phenomenon in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of conspiracy theories discussed on the Internet. Theories that once had few followers can become well-known through the mass media.
Conspiracy theorists get paid by websites according to how many viewers they attract. Websites that seem free to the user are paid for by adverts, usually quite harmless, though they may be annoying. The people who post individual articles get paid once the number of viewers exceeds a certain qualifying number.
== Critique ==
David Grimes has calculated that it takes at least three years to expose a conspiracy theory on the internet, depending on the number of people involved. Many conspiracy theories are exposed in three to four years.
== Related pages ==
Antisemitism
Cognitive bias
Disinformation
Social psychology
Sociocultural theory
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
== References ==
TITLE Disinformation
Disinformation refers to false information spread intentionally to make a targeted audience believe something that is not based on facts. Disinformation may include the distribution of forged documents, manuscripts and photographs, or the promotion of harmful rumors, conspiracy theories and fake intelligence.
== Conspiracy theories ==
A major form of disinformation is conspiracy theories. Examples of conspiracy theories include but not limited to:
Holocaust denial
Irish slaves myth
Antisemitic tropes
9/11 conspiracy theories
UFO conspiracy theories
Rwandan genocide denial
Chemtrail conspiracy theory
Cambodian genocide denial
Moon landing conspiracy theories
John F. Kennedy's assassination conspiracy theories
Illuminati and Freemasonry-related conspiracy theories
Diana, Princess of Wales' death-related conspiracy theories
== Online disinformation ==
Disinformation is particularly common on the most visited websites worldwide, including Wikipedia, Reddit and Instagram. On January 23, 2025, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) said in a press release that a UNESCO study found 16% of all Holocaust-related content across social media to be denying or distorting.
=== Wikipedia ===
==== Croatian Wikipedia ====
Between 2009 and 2021, Croatian Wikipedia was controlled by a group of far-right administrators who promoted Holocaust denial by censoring the war crimes of the pro-Nazi Ustaše-ruled Independent State of Croatia (NDH) and blocking dozens of rule-abiding users for trying to remove the false content.
Željko Jovanović, the Minister of Science of Croatia back then, also advised against the use of the Croatian Wikipedia. The most serious violation by the far-right administrators was their anti-historical designation of the Jasenovac concentration camp, in which 77,000–99,000 were killed, as a "collection camp". Their Holocaust denial was condemned by scholars, officials, advocacy groups and media critics.
Following a year-long investigation (2020–21) by the Wikimedia Foundation, several complicit users and administrators were either banned or demoted, with one of the administrators found to have consolidated his or her power with 80 sockpuppet accounts.
==== English Wikipedia ====
English Wikipedia was criticized for condoning the systematic whitewashing of Nazi war criminals on the platform. For instance, Arthur Nebe (a senior SS official who invented mobile gas chambers to kill Jews) was portrayed as a savior of Jews by users who distorted a cited source that actually said the opposite. SS units responsible for the Holocaust were either depicted as brave fighters or described in passive voice to make their atrocities look normal.
Those who corrected the false content had also faced persistent harassment from pro-Nazi users, some of whom were found to have repeatedly cited materials from Holocaust-denying sources (e.g. Journal of Historical Review, Nation Europa and Franz Kurowski), misrepresented them as academic consensus and gamed the rules to prevent the false content from being removed. The violations continued for years with limited administrative intervention, which mainstreamed Nazi sympathy among young readers and hurt efforts to preserve the Holocaust's historical truth. German military historian Jens Westemeier commented on the issue,
The English Wikipedia pages are far more sympathetic towards the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS than the German ones [. ...] Wikipedia and Amazon are the worst distributors of pro-Nazi perspectives and the ["clean"] Wehrmacht myth.
In 2023, Holocaust historians Prof. Jan Grabowski and Dr. Shira Klein published a 57-page article saying that they had found widespread distortion of the Polish Holocaust history on English Wikipedia, which involved the exaggeration of Jewish collaboration with Nazi/Soviet occupiers, invention of Jewish "atrocities" against Poles, downplaying of Polish collaboration with Nazi/Soviet occupiers, and blaming Jews for their own suffering:
Four distortions dominate Wikipedia’s coverage of Polish–Jewish wartime history: a false equivalence narrative suggesting that Poles and Jews suffered equally in World War II; a false innocence narrative, arguing that Polish antisemitism was marginal, while the Poles’ role in saving Jews was monumental; antisemitic tropes insinuating that most Jews supported Communism and conspired with Communists to betray Poles (Żydokomuna or Judeo–Bolshevism), that money-hungry Jews controlled or still control Poland, and that Jews bear responsibility for their own persecution.
Prof. Grabowski and Dr. Klein also criticized English Wikipedia's administrators and Wikimedia Foundation's lack of will to handle, leaving the site vulnerable to disinformation:
Wikipedia’s administrators have largely failed to uphold Wikipedia’s policies [. ...] unable to deal with the issue of persistent distortion [...] Wikipedia’s articles [...] have become a hub of misinformation and antisemitic canards.
On another occasion, Prof. Grabowski said,
As a historian, I was aware [...] of various distortions [...] of the Holocaust on Wikipedia. What I found shocking, was the sheer scale [...] and the small number of individuals needed to distort the history of one of the greatest tragedies in the history of humanity.
Some misconceptions about the Holocaust in Poland are summarized as follows:
In 2024, independent investigations uncovered a large-scale off-site canvassing campaign to rewrite Jewish history and reshape the narrative surrounding the Israel–Palestine conflict, which involved 40 accounts having made as many as 2,000,000 edits to around 10,000 Jewish-related articles.
The off-site canvassing campaign was coordinated by an 8,000-member Tech for Palestine Discord channel, where the organizers provided the participants in-depth training (e.g. strategy planning sessions, group audio "office hour" chats) on getting used to Wikipedia's site operation, assigning participants (in groups of 2~3) to edit hundreds of articles in rotation, and gaming the rules to block others from correcting them.
Reported examples of their revisionist edits include
On 12 December 2024, English Wikipedia's arbitration committee announced that two editors had been site-banned indefinitely for off-site canvassing and "encouraging other users to game the extended confirmed restriction and engage in disruptive editing." Another three editors have also been sanctioned for similar reasons. On January 17, 2025, English Wikipedia's arbitration committee further voted to impose indefinite topic-bans on multiple longtime editors associated with the organized campaign. ADL's CEO Jonathan Greenblatt commented,
[I]t is now imperative for Wikipedia to [...] undo the harm caused by these rogue but prolific editors who [...] wreaked havoc across the platform [. ...] a systemic problem [...] that needs immediate action.
== Related pages ==
Anti-intellectualism
Wikipedia:Distortionists
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
== References ==
</wikipedia_requested_titles>
Given below is the article you have to analyze. Generate the JSON as per schema with relevant keyword summaries as per instructions.
strictly response in json formate.
<article>
A MAGA congressional candidate is facing backlash after spreading conspiracy theories about the deadly flash floods along the Guadalupe River in Texas.
Kandiss Taylor, who is running to represent Georgia in the House of Representatives, posted on X Saturday: “Fake weather. Fake hurricanes. Fake flooding. Fake. Fake. Fake.”
Her bizarre post came as authorities searched for dozens of people thought to have lost their lives in Texas’ flash floods. Of the 30 people confirmed dead so far, at least nine were children, and 27 girls are still missing from Camp Mystic, a riverside Christian camp in Hunt, Texas.
Taylor later posted her message again: “FAKE WEATHER. REAL DAMAGE.”
“This isn’t just ‘climate change.’ It’s cloud seeding, geoengineering, & manipulation,“ she added. ”If fake weather causes real tragedy, that’s murder. Pray. Prepare. Question the narrative.”
When she later acknowledged that tragedy had struck, someone in the comments called her out for walking back her earlier post. She wrote back: “I’m not walking back a thing. No one can control the way you raging liberals twist words. Brainwashed zombies.”
Taylor, who recently ran to be Georgia’s governor, was slammed by leaders across the nation.
“Do your job Georgia… Is this the best you have got?” attorney Tracey Gallagher wrote.
Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) added: “Hey Texas. What do you think of this? She’s running for congress as a Republican? Any thoughts?”
“Over two dozen dead and more children missing, and this candidate for Congress says the flooding in Texas is fake,” said retired intelligence officer Travis Akers.
“So the dead bodies floating in Texas are fake too? The homes ripped apart? The kids being pulled out of floodwater?” asked commentator Thomas Mix. “You’re a clown. Sit the hell down and stop embarrassing the human race. I guess not even Republicans care when Republicans are hit with natural disasters.”
Taylor, whose X bio reads: “Christian. Georgian. MAGA. Jesus, Guns & Babies,” also notes that she’s a candidate for Congress in 2026.
Her posts came one day after fatal, fast-moving waters rose 26 feet on Friday, washing away homes, sweeping aside vehicles, and killing dozens of nearby individuals.
Even President Donald Trump called the deaths in Texas “shocking.”
At least 850 people have been saved by rescue workers in the last 36 hours, said Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, including those “clinging to trees to save their lives.”
“Our Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, will be there shortly,” Trump said on Truth Social Saturday. “Melania and I are praying for all of the families impacted by this horrible tragedy.”
</article>